"Anon" (tjsielsistneb)
10/03/2014 at 17:42 • Filed to: None
3
5|
"Anon" (tjsielsistneb)
10/03/2014 at 17:42 • Filed to: None | 3
| 5 |
It's a Canon FL 35mm 3.5f with a fotodiox adapter (the blue thing). I've been out taking picutres and I can't wait to get home to see how they came out!
D
> Anon
10/03/2014 at 18:29 |
|
Now much was it? Not be critical but 35mm's with much wider apertures can be found for pretty cheap
|
Anon
> D
10/03/2014 at 18:32 |
|
$20. It dosen't really matter too much as I can't shoot wide open on a DSLR without the image looking terrible. Though If I could get a mirrorless camera it would work much better.
|
D
> Anon
10/03/2014 at 18:34 |
|
ahhhh okay, $20 lens lolyup—I'd pounce too.
I got an AF 35mm f/1.8 for $130 and it looks great so idk what you're talking about...
|
Anon
> D
10/03/2014 at 18:46 |
|
Oh no, not because it's wide open. It has to go though an optical adapter and because of that it screws with the image if it's wide open
|
D
> Anon
10/03/2014 at 18:54 |
|
Ah yeah, adapters can do that to you